Published 31 August 2026 · 5 min read · Exam Preparation
Here is the sheet, in full, free to copy. Two tables. One row per mock for the trend, one row per lost question for the diagnosis. I ran this through 30 mocks in 2017 before scoring 99.09 percentile. The second table is the one that did the work.
Preparing for CAT 2026? Solve 1000+ Free Questions on Percentyl
Mock and date | Section | Attempted | Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
M12, 14 Oct | VARC | 19 | 13 |
M12, 14 Oct | DILR | 12 | 9 |
M12, 14 Oct | QA | 16 | 10 |
Mock and date | Net score | Accuracy | Percentile |
M12 VARC | 33 | 68% | 92.4 |
M12 DILR | 24 | 75% | 96.1 |
M12 QA | 24 | 63% | 81.7 |
Three columns carry the whole sheet. Attempts, accuracy, percentile. Net score moves for reasons you cannot control. Accuracy against attempts moves for reasons you can.
Q no | Topic | Time spent | Loss reason |
|---|---|---|---|
Q7 | Time speed distance | 4:10 | Time sink |
Q11 | Para summary | 1:20 | Silly error |
Q14 | Logarithms | 2:40 | Concept gap |
Q18 | Arrangement set | 6:30 | Wrong selection |
Q21 | Averages | 0:50 | Guessed |
Five loss reasons, no more. The discipline is refusing to invent a sixth.
Count the loss reasons. The count tells you what to do next week. It is almost never what you assumed.
If most losses are | The next week is |
|---|---|
Concept gap | Study. Go back to the chapter, not to more mocks |
Silly error | Process. Re-read the question stem twice before solving |
Time sink | Timing. Hard cap of 2 minutes 30 seconds, then move |
Wrong selection | Selection drills. First five minutes of a DILR set, nothing else |
Guessed | Attempt discipline. You are attempting too many |
The reason I kept this sheet for 30 mocks is that my own diagnosis was wrong for the first eight. I thought my Quant was a concept problem. The sheet said 19 of 31 Quant losses were time sinks and silly errors. I had been studying chapters I already knew.
Percentile is the last thing to move, so do not judge the sheet by it for the first month. Accuracy moves first, then attempts, then percentile.
My own numbers went the way most people's do. Accuracy climbed from the low sixties to the high seventies over about ten mocks while my attempts stayed flat. The score barely moved. Then attempts climbed and the percentile jumped in one go.
If accuracy is flat across six mocks, the sheet is being filled in but not read. That is the common failure, not a lack of mocks.
Three things people add that quietly ruin it.
One thing worth adding after about ten mocks is a column for whether you have seen the same loss reason on the same topic before. A repeat is worth three fresh entries, because a repeat is the thing you have been failing to fix.
The sheet needs papers. Every CAT paper from 2020 to 2025 is free at percentyl.in/pyq, 18 full papers with worked solutions, attemptable in the browser with no sign in. Chapter-wise timed tests for the drills the sheet sends you to sit at percentyl.in/mock-tests/topic-tests.
If you want to compare your loss pattern against other aspirants, the threads at percentyl.in/community are the fastest way to find out that your problem is normal.
Log every wrong answer and every long skip against one of five reasons: concept gap, silly error, time sink, wrong selection or guessed. Count the reasons, then let the count decide the next week of study rather than your instinct.
About twice the length of the section. Forty minutes of DILR deserves roughly eighty minutes of review. If analysis takes less time than the mock, it is not analysis.
Twenty to twenty five full length mocks across the cycle is a workable target, with one a week in September, two a week in October and three a week in November.
Percentile moves last. Accuracy improves first, then attempts, then score. If accuracy has been flat across six mocks, the analysis is being recorded but not acted on.
Within 24 hours. After a day you cannot recall why you lost each question. The loss reasons become guesses, which makes the whole sheet useless.
Log every wrong answer and every long skip against one of five reasons: concept gap, silly error, time sink, wrong selection or guessed. Count the reasons, then let the count decide the next week of study rather than your instinct.
About twice the length of the section. Forty minutes of DILR deserves roughly eighty minutes of review. If analysis takes less time than the mock, it is not analysis.
Twenty to twenty five full length mocks across the cycle is a workable target, with one a week in September, two a week in October and three a week in November.
Percentile moves last. Accuracy improves first, then attempts, then score. If accuracy has been flat across six mocks, the analysis is being recorded but not acted on.
Within 24 hours. After a day you cannot recall why you lost each question. The loss reasons become guesses, which makes the whole sheet useless.